Apple has started the rumored campaign against Vista in its' stores. All Apple employees are seen with T-Shirts labelled "Go beyond Vista: It's time to get a Mac". They also have little cut-outs all around the store. In addition apple seems to have sent out emails to all iPod owners on PC with a similar slogan. Retail Vista sales have been lackluster in comparison to XP sales. Steve Balmer put the blames on pirates, but analysts say that Vista still isn't ready yet, and they are still waiting on drivers from all vendors.
Looks like the Longhorn / Vista curse is going to continue on Microsoft until the next version of Windows hits the stores. I feel so sad for Microsoft 
. They tried to fly too high in one shot instead of flying in increments. A lesson well learnt I assume.
Source: Microsoft Watch
I installed Windows Vista Ultimate edition about a week back (hence no posts for about a week 
). I got a licensed copy of the Business Edition, however, Vista comes on a DVD that has all editions on it, which lets you install any version that you want and evaluate it for 30 days. Note however that if you install a version higher than the one that you have the CD key for, you will have to reinstall the entire OS after 30 days. If you installed a lower version and entered the CD key from a higher version Vista will automatically upgrade to the higher version. To get the option for different versions, don't enter the CD Key, just click next and you will get a list of all different versions. Installation went smooth without any hiccups although I would say it is nowhere near to the 20 minute installation that Microsoft has been touting. It took a good 45 minutes to install (note: I installed this on a 4 year old machine which could be the reason why it took that long).
My first impressions of the OS is very good. It is much more performant on my old machine than I imagined. The new Aero look and feel is really nice and subtle. Microsoft has surely looked at what Apple has done over the years and brought that to the Windows world. I would however be cautious in calling it a rip off as it is not exactly the same as a Mac. They have copied the idea of adding subtle animations to certain tasks, like fade-in fade-out effects. Mac still has the edge right now which I think will fade-out when the next version of Windows ships somewhere in 2009.
Overall I think the OS is rock solid and want to make it my default OS. There are a few quirks that I want you to know before you run and get yourself Vista. Vista does not recognize my SoundBlaster Live 24 bit sound card. Neither Microsoft nor Creative has the drivers for it. The impression I get is neither companies plan to write the drivers for it. So I am sort off left out in the cold. Also Vista did not recognize my Logitech ClickSmart 510 webcam. Both devices are around 3 to 4 years old and probably will not be supported, hence my best suggestion for anyone wanting Vista is to wait until your next PC, otherwise be ready to replace the devices that don't work on Vista.
Final word: There is no way for me to go back to XP especially since I am sick of looking at the same desktop for 5 long years. However, I have to wait for a couple of months till I assemble a new PC. By then Windows Home Server will have shipped and I can convert my existing PC to a Home Server and enjoy Vista on the new one. The really cool thing about Home Server is that I can install SQL Server 2005 and transfer my website / media files to it and not bog down my new PC.
BTW I got onto the Home Server beta program (not a big deal any one can get on it by applying). I plan to install it and check it out to see what's new.
No it's not another Vista ad. It's about my home country. Check it out here. Click Watch Video to your right.
This is kind of a repost. If you read the Bill Gates Q and A article I posted yesterday, you must have read that Bill Gates mentioned what's next for Windows. For those who missed it here's the excerpt.
So can you give us an indication of what the next Windows will be like?
Well, it will be more user-centric.
What does that mean?
That means that right now when you move from one PC to another, you've got to install apps on each one, do upgrades on each one. Moving information between them is very painful. We can use Live Services [a way to connect to Microsoft via the Internet] to know what you're interested in. So even if you drop by a [public] kiosk or somebody else's PC, we can bring down your home page, your files, your fonts, your favorites and those things. So that's kind of the user-centric thing that Live Services can enable. [Also,] in Vista things got a lot better with [digital] ink and speech but by the next release there will be a much bigger bet. Students won't need textbooks, they can just use these tablet devices. Parallel computing is pretty important for the next release. We'll make it so that a lot of the high-level graphics will be just built into the operating system. So we've got a pretty good outline.
WOW! that would be awesome if I could go to a friends place and get my desktop on his / her machine. You would never miss your PC when you are away. Although, we don't know to what extent they will go. All of this sounds like Hardisk on the Internet, so all your information will stay on the Internet, but we don't know if that's going to be true for applications installed on my machine as well. All this would need very high bandwidth, but 2011 is still far away which could make some of this a reality.
I am quoting MSNBC news article by Steven Levy:
Are you bugged by the Apple commercial where John Hodgman is the PC, and he has to undergo surgery to get Vista?
I've never seen it. I don't think the over 90 percent of the [population] who use Windows PCs think of themselves as dullards, or the kind of klutzes that somebody is trying to say they are.
How about the implication that you need surgery to upgrade?
Well, certainly we've done a better job letting you upgrade on the hardware than our competitors have done. You can choose to buy a new machine, or you can choose to do an upgrade. And I don't know why [Apple is] acting like it’s superior. I don't even get it. What are they trying to say? Does honesty matter in these things, or if you're really cool, that means you get to be a lying person whenever you feel like it? There's not even the slightest shred of truth to it.
In many of the Vista reviews, even the positive ones, people note that some Vista features are already in the Mac operating system.
You can go through and look at who showed any of these things first, if you care about the facts. If you just want to say, "Steve Jobs invented the world, and then the rest of us came along," that's fine. If you’re interested, [Vista development chief] Jim Allchin will be glad to educate you feature by feature what the truth is. I mean, it’s fascinating, maybe we shouldn't have showed so publicly the stuff we were doing, because we knew how long the new security base was going to take us to get done. Nowadays, security guys break the Mac every single day. Every single day, they come out with a total exploit, your machine can be taken over totally. I dare anybody to do that once a month on the Windows machine. So, yes, it took us longer, and they had what we were doing, user interface-wise. Let’s be realistic, who came up with [the] file, edit, view, help [menu bar]? Do you want to go back to the original Mac and think about where those interface concepts came from?
Read the complete Q and A with Bill Gates here.
Wow! I didn't know that the File Edit ... menu bar was first created by Windows. I do know that Microsoft first showed the search features back in 2002 - 2003 and it hurt them real bad. Everyone from Google to Apple copied the idea and came out with real products way before Microsoft could come out with it's own. They surely learnt a valuable lesson from the Vista debacle. I think moving forward for Windows releases we are not going to see any cool new features until the Beta release, which kinda sucks!.
In response to my previous post, Lilly made some good comments. Here are a couple of them "Generilization is good in a way. But it never optimizes for performance", "Declarative type of programming? O, man. Are they planning to turn the developers to robots?" 
. Microsoft has a bigger goal than turning developers into Robots. Today when you write a program you instruct the compiler line by line the entire program. In short you tell the compiler how you want to accomplish rather than what. In SQL Server (true for all RDBMS) you never tell the SQL compiler how you want it to fetch data, you tell it what you want. That is exactly what Microsoft is trying to achieve with .NET 3.5.
By abstracting / generalizing the how from the programmer, the compiler will be able to make smart decisions on the most optimum way to get the desired results (just like SQL Server does). It is never fool proof and hence we will need some sort of a hinting mechanism (again just like SQL Server) for better performance.
In the end the biggest gain by abstraction is that when you run the same program on machines that have 2, 4 or 10 core processors (near future) the compiler can generate the how part of your code such that the CLR can divide the task and run the sub-tasks on different cores, merge the results from the sub-tasks into one result and return it to the program. This would lead to faster executions and hence better performance.
.NET 3.5 is the first step in this direction, Microsoft has a research project going on for almost a year now on PLINQ (Parallel Language INtegrated Query). I think we will see the fruits of this project in the next 2-5 years. Until then we can only feel dumb as more and more code gets auto-generated leaving less and less work for the developers. Look at the positive side, if we were still writing assembly code we wouldn't have been come so far in the computing world.
Check out what Microsoft had originally planned for Vista (then code named Longhorn). I prefer the original plan to what it is now. A point to note is that Microsoft's Designers make Macromedia Director movies of what the OS needs to look and feel like. This does look like one of those movies.
Obviously there is a clear mis-match between what designers wanted and what developers ended up doing. Hmmm.... I have heard this somewhere. That's right! Microsoft has come out with .NET 3.0 which takes care of this problem. They have used the web-based (CSS + HTML) model to windows programming (actually it's much more than that) with XAML. I wonder if .NET 3.0 is a direct result of the internal frustrations between designers and developers within Microsoft. If that's true, what it tells us is that the next version of Windows (to be released in the next 2 to 4 years) will look and feel much more like the designers want it to, not like what the developers end up coding. Now that's awesome.
When you look at the features (LINQ) Microsoft is adding to C# 3.0 you would say hey! wait a minute, that is a rip off of Hibernate. I think not. Why? because the main goal of Hibernate is to give you persistent storage and a very SQL like way of accessing the database. While that is what you can do in C# 3.0 the similarities stop right there. In LINQ you can query collections irrespective of where that collection came from. It may have come from the database or an XML file, flat file or any other source (Active directory, in memory collection created by you, anything). Hibernate, as it works with databases needs XML files for configuration. LINQ does not as it does not care about the source. The other big difference is that LINQ is baked right into the framework so you can be sure when it gets released that all built in classes (all meaning the ones that you think should) will support LINQ.
More later ... (after I get flamed for this post )
If you are a good photographer chances are that you can be famous in this age of blogging and flickr. Hamad Darwish is an amateur photographer who has toyed with cameras for only about two years now. He shares a lot of his work with others on flickr and learns a lot in return. So how did he become famous? Microsoft paid him to take some good pictures and used a couple of his pictures as background for Vista. You can read the entire interview he gave to Long Zheng here.
Obviously you now have to wait for the next version of Windows to get a request which means you have around 2 years to learn, do some good photography and make yourself noticable 
. With all the money that Microsoft has it still chose to go with amatuer photographers for Vista backgrounds
